Building an Argument With Hypothesis Testing
SeongKyun Cho1 & Glenn Ballard2
1 MS, Civil and Env. Engineering. Department, 407-A McLaughlin Hall, Univ. of California, Berkeley, CA 94720-1712, USA, Phone +1 510/725-7929, [email protected]2Director, Project Production System Laboratory, http://p2sl.berKeley.edu, and Adjunct Associate Professor , Civil and Env. Engineering. Department, 215-A McLaughlin Hall, Univ. of California, Berkeley, CA 94720-1712, USA, Phone +1 415/710-5531, [email protected]
Abstract
This paper presents a research methodology for testing the hypothesis, ―The implementation of Lean Construction improves project performance‖, and for supporting a recommendation that South Korea embrace Lean Construction. To meet general quantitative research requirements, the methodology will include hypothesis testing; measurement of variables in the hypothesis, a large N sampling and a small N case selection strategy, and interpretation of the findings. The results of executing the methodology will be published in future papers.
Keywords
Market competitiveness, Quantitative measurement, Statistical analysis, Lean Construction, South Korea
Files
Reference
Cho, S. & Ballard, G. 2010. Building an Argument With Hypothesis Testing, 18th Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction , 335-344. doi.org/
Download: BibTeX | RIS Format
Founded in 1993, the IGLC is an international network of researchers from practice and academia in architecture, engineering, and construction (AEC) who feel that the practice, education, and research of the AEC industry have to be radically renewed in order to respond to the global challenges ahead.
2015 © All Rights Reserved.