https://doi.org/10.24928/2018/0477

Using Taktplanning and Taktcontrol in Production Projects – Comparsion of Construction and Equipment Phases

Janosch Dlouhy1, Svenja Oprach2, Marco Binninger3, Tobias Richter4 & Shervin Haghsheno5

1Research Fellow, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Germany, +49-721-608-42168, [email protected]
2Research Fellow, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Germany, +49-721-608- 44124,[email protected]
3Research Fellow, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Germany, +49-721-608-44124, [email protected]
4M.Sc. Student, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Germany, +49-721-608-43650, [email protected]
5Professor, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Germany, +49-721-608-42646, [email protected]

Abstract

Takt Planning and Takt Control (TPTC) as a method for construction processes shows the potential for improving time aspects of construction sites in many practical examples. A first example of using the method of TPTC not only in construction but also in following processes such as equipment installation (production projects) indicates equal improvements. By analyzing 10 construction and seven equipment installation case studies, this paper gives an overview of similarities and differences in construction and equipment projects. Furthermore, it describes adjustments for using TPTC in the construction stage as well as in the equipment assembly stage and picturing each stage’s timetable in one common Takt Plan for increased clarity. Interlinking planning phases of both stages shows not only, that further time savings in implementation phases can be realized, but also that overall project planning can benefit from considering interfaces to upstream and downstream phases.

Keywords

Lean construction, lean equipment, comparison, process, work flow.

Files

Reference

Dlouhy, J. , Oprach, S. , Binninger, M. , Richter, T. & Haghsheno, S. 2018. Using Taktplanning and Taktcontrol in Production Projects – Comparsion of Construction and Equipment Phases, 26th Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction , 890-898. doi.org/10.24928/2018/0477

Download: BibTeX | RIS Format