https://doi.org/10.24928/2019/0197
Process Versus Operations Workflow – Making the Case for Continuous Monitoring of Construction Operations
David Grau1, Amin Abbaszadegan2 & Rizan Assanair3
1David Grau, Assistant Professor, School of Sustainable Engineering and the Built Environment, Arizona State University, 660 S College Avenue, Tempe, AZ 85281, USA, Phone +1 (480) 727-0665; email: [email protected]2Amin Abbaszadegan, Ph.D., School of Sustainable Engineering and the Built Environment, Arizona State University, 660 S College Avenue, Tempe, AZ 85281, USA, Phone +1 (416) 347-7547; email: [email protected]
3Rizwan Assainar, MS, School of Sustainable Engineering and the Built Environment, Arizona State University, 660 S College Avenue, Tempe, AZ 85281, USA, Phone +1 (480) 727-0665; email: [email protected]
Abstract
This article argues that an opportunity to leverage operations flow in construction exists. Operations flow represents the flow of work within a unit of production such as a worker or workstation. To date, construction has mostly neglected operations flow and solely focused on process flow. Process flow represents how the flow of work on a product moves through workstations or tasks. For example, the Last Planner System (LPS) exemplifies a successful approach to plan for tasks with resolved constraints, so that production units (e.g. crews) can flow smoothly through the built product or project. In order to spark a discussion in the construction community, this article provides a theoretical review of process and operations flow concepts and practices. In addition, interviews with subject matter experts in the automobile industry are leveraged in order to unveil how work and information flows are monitored in assembly lines. Based on the previous insights, a model for the continuous monitoring of operations in construction with the support of advanced technologies is discussed. The model is partially implemented in a healthcare project.
Keywords
Project controls, variability, work flow, process flow, operations flow, value, takt-time planning.
Files
Reference
Grau, D. , Abbaszadegan, A. & Assanair, R. 2019. Process Versus Operations Workflow – Making the Case for Continuous Monitoring of Construction Operations, Proc. 27th Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction (IGLC) , 563-572. doi.org/10.24928/2019/0197
Download: BibTeX | RIS Format
Founded in 1993, the IGLC is an international network of researchers from practice and academia in architecture, engineering, and construction (AEC) who feel that the practice, education, and research of the AEC industry have to be radically renewed in order to respond to the global challenges ahead.
2015 © All Rights Reserved.