TY  - CONF
TI  - The symphony of construction: a data-driven comparison of Takt and traditional construction
AU  - Khan, Mawara
AU  - Gollee, Paulina
AU  - Riekki, Jaakko
AU  - Görsch, Christopher
AU  - Seppänen, Olli
AD  - Doctoral Researcher, Department of Civil Engineering, Aalto University, Finland, mawara.khan@aalto.fi, orcid.org/0009-0001-1317-2931
AD  - Doctoral Researcher, Department of Civil Engineering, Aalto University, Finland, paulina.gollee@aalto.fi, orcid.org/0009-0003-5270-7737
AD  - Doctoral Researcher, Department of Civil Engineering, Aalto University, Finland, jaakko.riekki@aalto.fi, orcid.org/0000-0002-0306-2165
AD  - Senior Scientist, VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland, christopher.gorsch@vtt.fi, orcid.org/0000-0001-9632-4031
AD  - Associate Professor, Department of Civil Engineering, Aalto University, Finland, olli.seppanen@aalto.fi, orcid.org/0000-0002-2008-5924
ED  - Hamzeh, Farook
ED  - Poshdar, Mani
ED  - Garcia-Lopez,, Nelly P.
ED  - Gan, Vincent
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/06/22
T2  - Proceedings of the 34th Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction (IGLC 34)
C3  - Proceedings of the 34th Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction (IGLC 34)
CY  - Singapore, Singapore
SP  - 50
EP  - 61
DO  - 10.24928/2026/0171
SN  - 2789-0015 (ISSN)
AB  - The construction industry has been struggling with inefficiencies and operational flow interruptions in traditional project delivery. In contrast, the Takt planning method is emerging as a lean alternative designed to create a robust and streamlined trade flow. Despite growing takt adoption, the granular effects of takt versus traditional construction of individual worker flow have not been explored. This study conducts a comparative analysis of two case studies, one using traditional methods and one using takt planning. Analysis is based on quantitative indoor positioning system (IPS) data from workers on both projects. The findings reveal notable differences in operational flow. The quantitative data suggests that the traditional environment indicates a "stop-and-work" workflow with high variability and weak coordination between workers. In contrast, the Takt environment shows a stable, rhythmic, and highly synchronized workflow. The indicated contrast in the worker movement patterns suggests the practical differences between the two methods.  This paper studies the effects of Takt on individual workers and movement-related waste compared to the traditional approach. The findings suggest that takt production is associated with reduced movement-related waste and more controlled operational flow.
KW  - Worker tracking
KW  - Takt production
KW  - construction operations flow
KW  - indoor positioning
KW  - lean construction.
L1  - https://www.iglc.net/papers/details/2483/pdf
UR  - https://www.iglc.net/papers/details/2483
DB  - IGLC.net
LA  - English
N1  - Export date: 04 October 2026
ER  -